Friday, January 30, 2026

BSI weekend 2026 summary

Well, the 2026 Baker Street Irregulars 'weekend' in Manhattan has come and gone. It was a wonderful visit, and in this post I'll summarize what I got up to. What I can't capture easily in describing events is the camaraderie and friendship that permeates everything. Whether it's New York, or Ellicott City, or Sydney, people are the reason this is fun. I apologize for all the photos - it will make this a very long post.

Plot-spoiler:


I arrived on WEDNESDAY evening and had a chance to say hello to some wonderful people at the ASH Wednesday dinner. Organized by the Adventuresses of Sherlock Holmes, the dinner is often the first event for many attendees, and a chance to see old friends.

THURSDAY.

This was my busy day - so busy I missed at least one event I really wanted to be at. 

I started with an early breakfast with the Brothers Two of Bellanger, Ross Davies and Mark Jones for smashed av and a flat white for brekky (gotta start the day as Aussie as possible!), then over the road to the ACD Society Doylean Honors event at the Mysterious Bookshop. 


 

The event is hosted by Ross Davies, and yet again it was a packed house! A highlight was Victoria Woods' spectacular Victorian dress (above, right), and the room was absolutely full (above, left). 


The ACD Society site lists all the awardees - I was particularly thrilled to see Margie Deck receive a literary award for 'Into the Fire', and Watson's Tin Box member Carla Coupe won a 'Visual Arts' award for her 'A. Conan Doyle Egg'. This was followed by the annual Wessex Cup - a model horse race. I again had a horse (named Monash) and lost in the first round. The final round was slo close it required Phil Bergem and Mark Jones to call a dead heat and a re-run. The entire proceedings can be watched on the Youtube video embedded below.

   

Afterwards. I realized I completely mis-timed the day and wasn't going to make a lunch date, so I tagged along to McSorley's where people were gathered for lunch. It was a great chance for a few glasses of dark with Ed Petit of the Rosenbach Library in Philly. McSorley's Old Ale House is a magical place - the walls are covered in pictures, including one of Christopher Morley who founded the BSI, and sawdust on the floor. Also gathered at my table were a great bunch including Anna Behrens, Johanna Draper Carlson, Victoria Wood, and Kyndall Potts



Next was the Bowery Ruffians - the second year of the scion meeting.This year we met in the back bar of the Swift Hibernian Lounge (suitably literary) - it was a beautiful venue, a good turn-out and plenty of new members were rewarded with a pin. I welcomed attendees from a lectern installed in the bar, Mickey Fromkin read out her toast (which will be read out at the start of every meeting), and a number of toasts to criminals in the canon were read out around the room. Carl Stix probably stole the show, asserting that Watson was a criminal for not writing up more of the cases!! Another successful meeting of the Ruffians is in the bag.


Left: The back bar of the Swift Hibernian loung, and Right: an excellent Guiness was on tap.

Thursday evening kicked on; first, I was lucky enough to attend the Baker Street Journal reception, where the Morley-Montgomery award for best article in the BSJ was awarded to Fabienne Courouge ! Then I had to scoot to the Algonquin Hotel (first time there) to meet with some of the Scourers (those who search for Dancing Men in newspapers) - including Ira Matetsky, Greg Ruby, Victoria Wood, and happily Steven Rothman joined us.

THEN (it's still Thursday at this point folks) I headed over for my very first experience at the SPODE Dinner. SPODE? The Society for the Prevention of Oysters Destroying Earth, inspired by the Holmes statement that "I cannot think why the whole bed of the ocean is not one solid mass of oysters, so prolific the creatures seem. No doubt there are natural enemies which limit the increase of the creatures. You and I, Watson, we have done our part. Shall the world, then, be overrun by oysters?". Steve Doyle's brainchild meets on Thursday evening at the Oyster Bar in Grand Central Station. I had a chance to meet some mid-westerners, and next to Bob Katz who always entertains me. I just wish I could repeat the tales!

When you become a member of SPODE, you can buy the coveted SPODE pin created by Sherlockian jewelry maker Regina Stinson - what a beauty (the pin):
 


Above: the pin and myself. Below: real oysters for comparison with pin, and a view of the oyster bar itself.

Now I know what you're thinking... what a day - Matt must have gone to bed then. But NO - I went with Ed Petit, Max Magee, Betsy Rosenblatt, and Alex Katz among others to the Red Room to see a remarkable Sherlockian performance by Tiffany Knight BSI. It was absinthe night, and Tiffany-in-deerstalker selected some wonderful songs. She captured the mood of the weekend perfectly by drawing in a packed room of people (the general public, NOT Sherlockians) to garrulously join in on the choruses of 'We Never Mention Aunt Clara'. Tiffany also recited Vincent Starrett's poem 221B.

Perhaps the highlight for me was when Hank the puppet  with his own deerstalker and pipe joined Tiffany on Stage (from The Hank Show and operated by Chris Johnson) - and was made a member of the Bowery Ruffians - yes the Red Room was close enough to the Bowery and Tiffany welcomed Hank to the fold on stage !! Tiffany - your show MUST be repeated !!



Hank with his pin, and onstage with Tiffany


FRIDAY.

Friday culminated in the BSI Dinner. So I was in bed early on Thursday night, and went for a run on Friday morning before the Literary Agents meeting (on Zoom). This wonderful meeting celebrates Doyle and Sherlock, and this year Ashley Polasek hosted a discussion of Sherlockian adaptations, moderating a panel discussion of writers Jonathan Barnes (Sherlock Holmes Untold), Jeffrey Hatcher (Holmes and Watson), Ken Ludwig (Baskerville) and Mark Shanahan (A Sherlock Carol).

Sad you missed it? Watch it right here:

After lunch with Mark Jones, we headed up to the Grolier Club. For the last three years, I've headed up to see the exhibition. This year was another stunning exhibition - The Pocket Petrarchs coordinated with one of three curators of an exhibition of 250 years of Jane Austen. There was an amazing display from first editions (without Austen's name) all the way through to modern day. The good news is the the exhibition can be viewed on-line for those unable to visit NY. There is also a delightful catalog.


Left: A first edition of Sense and Sensibility by 'a lady'. Right: Mark Jones and Peter Blau catch up while waiting for the guided tour to begin. Peter is on the right.

Then it was back to the hotel to get myself in shape for the Baker Street Irregulars dinner at the Yale club! This was my second year attending the dinner. The dinner is truly a grand affair. 
First is a cocktail reception hour, which is a great opportunity to connect with people all while mauling your way to the bar - I had a great time chatting with Liza Potts about her work with sherlockian.net


Left: With the ever-dapper Mickey Fromkin. The cool thing is Mickey's
 dinner suit, which originally belonged to Roger Wolfe Kahn. According to Mickey, "Roger was a tiny man, and was a hugely successful jazz bandleader as a teenager.... The suit is probably a 100 years old or so, though I had the silk lapels refaced some years ago". Right: With Red Circle luminary Peter Blau. 

Dinner included two wonderful talks (Mark Jones won with a lot of puns). At my table number 7 were a wonderful group:  Karen Wilson (from WTB) and Alex Katz who together were the musical performers for the evening ; Carl Stix ; Will Walsh (roving photographer) ; Regina StinsonNick Martorelli ; Mike McSwiggin .... and of course me! 

After dinner, the talks, and lots of chatting, the 2026 investitures were announced by Wiggins (Michael Kean) in this order:

Michael Barton - "Baron Von Herling"
Matt Hall - "The Earl of Maynooth"
Linda Hein - "The Hotel National"
Jen Kneeland - "The Haymarket Theatre"
Richard Krisciunas - "William Morris"
Max Magee - "Cyril Morton"
Rusty Mason - "John Mason"
Ashley Mayo - "Capital and Counties Bank"
Madeline QuiƱones - "Sir Joshua Reynolds"
George Scheetz - "John Clayton"
P.J. Sullivan - "The Ancient Cornish Language"
Tom Ue - "London University"


What can I say? It's a wonderful group of people to be alongside. An honor. When  the Wiggins announces each investiture, it's a slow reveal. In my case, the Sydney Passengers were mentioned, and the being Gasogene of Watson's Tin Box - someone said "it's Matt". I made an instant mental note to learn more about 'The Earl of Maynooth'. I then stood up front while the remaining ten BSI's were announced and it was a lot of fun to watch their faces as they realized what was happening. What's really wonderful is that I knew so many of my fellow inductees really well.

Along with these, there were two really exciting announcements: 'Two Shilling' awards for above-and-beyond

Evelyn Herzog - The Two Shilling Award
Denny Dobry - The Two Shilling Award

With Tamar Zeffren BSI and WTB colleague Jacquelynn Bost Morris BSI at the BSI dinner.

After dinner it was down to the Yale Club bar for a couple of beers with Mark Jones. I particularly like this photo I took for some eminent Sherlockians. I'm not a photographer, but I love this pic :



SATURDAY.

My last full day of activities this BSI weekend. I visited the salesroom in the morning, exercising great restraint, and really restricting myself to new books. I was excited to purchase:

- Sherlock Holmes Review (Wessex Press) - I have an article in it on the Baker Street File.
- Annotated Brigadier Girard (Wessex Press)
- On the Shoulders of Giants (Wessex Press) - I have a chapter in it on the John Bennett Shaw
Irregular Chronicles of the Early ‘Fifties (BSI Press) 

Then off to the BSI Luncheon at the Yale Club - a refined affair, and a wonderful afternoon. At each luncheon, there is an auction of items to benefit the Watson Fund, the helps people attend the BSI Weekend. Peter Blau has hosted the auction.... forever? This year I contributed something for the auction - a complete set of Donald Girard Jewell's 'Sherlock Holmes Natural History Series' books, nine in total. I was amazed to see them see for over $2,000 !

 

After the auction, Peter revealed that he was stepping down as auctioneer, and handed over his gavel to Scott Monty. He also handed over his powder blue blazer. It was a very touching moment.

There was also a raffle to raise funds, featuring an AMAZING model of the Bruce-Partington submarine, created by Danna Mancini. I wanted to win it - so so much!. I did not. It is a beauty though:


After lunch, I had a chance to relax, then met my close friend Kyle for our now-traditional 'Lost in New York with a Bunch of Sherlockians', organized and hosted by the amazing Kegley's. We started off with a cocktail and oysters in the Grand Central Station Brasserie with an amazing 'back bar'.

 

Then it was off to a new venue for the event -  Rosie Dunn's. It was yet another wonderful night of raffles draws, food, and friendship. More conversations with friends, everyone wins an amazing prize - had time to chat with Debbie Clark, Karen Wilson, Carl Stix, Brian Bellanger, and of course Jerry Kegley. So much fun.

I gave a toast to Doyle, and we announced a special pin for the 'Lost in New York with a Bunch of Sherlockians' , which Kyle designed. Jerry wanted something with a magnifying glass showing the NY skyline - Kyle delivered that.... and then A LOT MORE because when you rotate the pin it reveals.... Sherlock and his pipe. It really is the coolest design. We're sending everyone who attended a pin as soon as they arrive from the manufaturer in the next week or two.
And with that.....

....a walk back to the hotel through a cold and misty evening, and an end to a wonderful few days of camaraderie, laughs, and literary discussion.




Monday, January 26, 2026

Toilets in the Canon

I recently realized that my very first Sherlockian article - the first thing I submitted (not the first published) is not on my blog. I did describe the article on my blog when it was published, but perhaps I didn't feel confident enough to post the article.

Well, it's a bit late but let's share it properly:

Seeking Relief in the Canon
in The Sherlock Holmes Review, 2023 Sherlockian Annual
Available from: wessexpress.com

The Review is a fantastic publication - and this one features Brett on the front cover and several articles celebrating the 40th anniversary of the Granada series on Holmes.

This article is a little whimsical, but underneath it is a seriously written and researched. It is also the first Sherlockian article I ever wrote. As the Review is an annual publication, and as this was accepted in January 2023, I've been twiddling my thumbs excited for my first article to be published, even if it has been bypassed chronologically by other things I've written :)


The article addresses the total absence of toilets in the canon - not mentioned, not used, not located. The idea came as I reflected on the mundane aspects of everyday life that even Sherlock must conduct - and of course this includes going to the bathroom. I wasn't sure about the idea, but at the very first Sherlockian meeting I attended - the 2022 BSI Conference at Bear Mountain NY - I was encourage to start writing (see below). It took a few months to gather the references (i.e. buy the rare books to read the articles) to make sure I'd covered all bases. My article definitely takes a light-hearted view and identifies several moments in the canon where - when reading the correct way - we can catch our characters in the act. 

Those who know me will not be shocked at the topic, but having selected the topic I assure you that I researched the topic throughly! 



Seeking relief in the Canon

It was a chilly evening as I scanned the Times for coverage of Holmes’ recent success. I doubled over the paper and rested it on my knees as footsteps echoed without, and all of a sudden there was a loud rapping on the rattly door. 

“Watson! You’ve been in there for 20 minutes. Our carriage awaits if we are to make the 11:20 from Waterloo!"

“Holmes ! There’s a more pressing loo situation right now. How long was that grouse on the sideboard that we partook of to celebrate our successful resolution of this case of the missing stomach.

“Are you sure it wasn’t the trifle?” mused Holmes, and I heard his boots spin on the spot as Holmes trod off to placate the carriage driver out on Baker St."

The above is not in fact the start of a low-brow comic pastiche, but highlights an absence in the canon. Much like the curious incident of the dog in the night-time, we are faced with the curious incident of the toilet in the night-time: ‘But the toilet did not flush in the night-time’. That indeed is a curious incident, given the universal need to do so for every character in the canon, multiple times a day.

There are a range of terms that might have been used in Victorian times to refer to the room (or device) one might use to relieve oneself: lavatory, water closet (W.C.), toilet, loo, commode, crapper, privy. The rich linguistic adaptation of humanity is reflected in the emergence and evolution of the may terms used to describe the toilet. Today (2022), there is certainly cultural and geographic divergence in addressing the delicacies of relieving oneself. As a youth in Australia the practical and direct statement query be “where is the toilet?”, where the toilet was the name for the room, as well as the flushable receptacle within. I was amused to spend time in England and learn the term ‘“loo' and the vague ‘W.C.', and moreso to settle in the US and learn that the bathroom was referred to using misdirection as the “restroom”. In what way was it restful?Am I doing it wrong?

Across fifty-six short stories and four novels in the canon I have been unable to identify any direct reference to the use of a toilet or chamber pot, nor any visit to an outhouse, for what we may coyly refer to as number 1s or number 2s. Furthermore, a survey of many illustrations of the canon (Mike Foye, ’Sherlock Holmes: A Study in Illustrations Volume II ; Nicholas Utechin, ’The Complete Paget Portfolio’ ; BSI Manuscript Series, 'G.K. Chesteron’s Sherlock Holmes’) revealed no toilet, outhouse, or chamber pot in any illustration.

A critical point to make when surveying the canon is that the meaning of the word ‘toilet’ itself has evolved. Today, we know ‘toilet' to refer to a porcelain basin one can sit upon to urinate or defecate into (or stand over if one is suitably endowed and skilled). The word derives from the French word ’toilette’, which refers to the act of washing and dressing in preparation for the day ahead, and it was also used in this sense in Victorian England. These preparations would take place in the bedroom where a washstand and mirror might be situated (or possibly a room with a bath, called a 'bathroom'). This is a critical point that may disconcert the modern reader of the canon. 

There are three separate references to ’toilet’ in the canon, each clearly (and reassuringly) describing ablutions, not emmissions. In ’The Adventure of the Three Students’ (set down by Baring-Gould as occurring April 5-6 1895, but first published in 1904), Watson described spending the evening at his lodgings when "At eight in the morning {Holmes} came into my room just as I finished my toilet.” In ’The Adventure of Wisteria Lodge’ (set down by Baring-Gould as occurring March 24-29 1890, but first published in 1908) when Mr. Scott Eccles arrives at 221B, Holmes deduces that "no one can glance at your toilet and attire without seeing that your disturbance dates from the moment of your waking”, which Eccles affirms with the statement "I never gave a thought to my toilet. I was only too glad to get out of such a house.” The informality of Holmes conducting toilet in the evening at the successful conclusion of ’The Dying Detective’ (set down by Baring-Gould as occurring November 19 1887, but first published in 1913) is perhaps most insightful with the delightful imagery of Holmes “...as he refreshed himself with a glass of claret and some biscuits in the intervals of his toilet” (the Victorian equivalent of a shower beer?). 

No chamber pot? Holmes in his bed in ’The Dying Detective’, as shown in the 1913 illustration by Walter Paget in The Strand Magazine.

It is reasonable to assert that a contemporary (2022) conversation would not use the word ‘toilet’ in conversation as employed in Victorian times. Yet neither Baring-Gould (1967) or Klinger (2005) chose to annotate the Victorian usage of the word and provide clarification for the reader. 

Accepting that the word ’toilet’ was reserved for… not the toilet… what options would Holmes and Watson have had to relieve themself, say around 1895? Certainly in late Victorian London, a sewer system existed, and flushable toilets were available. Open sewers feeding into the Thames reached crisis point with the Great Stink of 1858, stimulating a bill to be rushed through Parliament that resulted in the construction of 1,300 miles of covered sewers under the direction of Sir Joseph Bazalgette, the Chief Engineer of the Metropolitan Board of Works. The London public toilet ‘arrived’ on the scene thanks to George Jennings for the 1851 Great Exhibition, and the male-dominated underground public toilets were opened in London from 1885 (the first at the Royal Exchange). As such, Watson and Holmes were in a position to ‘go’ while they were on the go around London. 

The flushable toilet was developed throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, with the S-bend to prevent the back flow of noxious air from pipes and sewers being patented in 1775. The flushable toilet with a cistern high overhead, allowed toilets to be situated in outhouses (in many cases replacing the pit or can), and by the 1890s toilets installed in dwellings in a ‘water closet’ were not uncommon. Acts of Parliament in the twentieth centuries mandated the installation of an indoor water closet (toilet) in new homes (1919), and provided for improvements to existing properties to install a toilet. 

By 1895, it is reasonable to assume that 221B Baker St would have installed a water closet within the building, or by extension on the back of the building. Bernard Davies’ detailed essay on the precise location of 221B (’The Back Yards of Baker Street’ in ‘Holmes & Watson Country’) assesses all information shared on the exterior of the lodgings, and reminds us that in ’The Problem of Thor Bridge’ (set down by Baring-Gould as occurring October 4-5 1900, but first published in 1922) Watson obeyers that "the last remaining leaves were being whirled from the solitary plane tree which graces the yard behind our house”. Critically, there is no mention of an out house standing in the yard, lending argument to the water closet/toilet being located within the 221B building proper. 

There was a room containing a bath on the floor above Watson & Holmes’ sitting room (where Watson’s bedroom was also) as in ’The Sign of Four’ (set down by Baring-Gould as occurring September 18-21 1888, first published in 1890) "A bath at Baker Street and a complete change freshened me up wonderfully. When I came down to our room I found the breakfast laid and Holmes pouring out the coffee.” This acting of bathing by Watson upstairs, and the inferred presence of a bath room, has received attention. For example, Newton’s 1956 reconstruction of 221B described the back yard area of 221B containing “a coal shed, and…. A solitary plane tree” but no out house, and speculates that the bath room was located on the top floor of 221B (above the sitting room). The inference here is that the toilet is located at the highest point in the building.

This bath room should not be mistaken in the modern sense as containing a toilet. A modern US definition of bathroom (single compound word) is "a room in a house or public building that contains a toilet” (Collins Dictionary), but the 1923 Webster’s Dictionary defines a bath room (two words) as “a room to bathe in”. This diversion into baths leads to a point: the presence of a bath, or bath room, in 221B does not necessarily indicate the location of a toilet. In fact, it may not have indicated plumbing, and hot water may have been carted up flights of stairs to enable Watson’s bath in 1895. And so, the occupants of 221B are still left hopping from one foot to another wondering where the toilet is. 

The toilet in 221B is most likely on the ground floor (the first floor for the American readers and publishers), located toward the back of the building. This would provide a facility for all members of the house hold, including Mrs. Hudson.

We know Watson to be a discrete and considerate narrator. Watson withholds some thrilling stories from Holmes’ accomplishments to protect the parties involved, and changes the names of others. It is no surprise that his proprieties extend to avoiding references to Holmes ducking into a public lavatory as they marched through London.

For even Toby in 'The Sign of The Four' “...looked neither to the right nor to the left, but trotted onwards with his nose to the ground and an occasional eager whine which spoke of a hot scent.” Really? The path from Upper Norwood to Broderick and Nelson’s large timber-yard was likely around 7 miles and would have taken almost 2 hours to talk (less accounting for Tobie’s quick pace). Surely a new trail of scent was created by Tobie for other canines to follow as he led the way through 'Streatham, Brixton, Camberwell’. But when we analyze the text, we find room for Tobie’s diversion on a patch on grass. Upon arriving at Miles Street and Knight’s Place (close to the final destination), Toby ceased and 'Then he waddled round in circles, looking up to us from time to time, as if to ask for sympathy in his embarrassment’. Here then, we find direct evidence of relief in the Canon, in the form of Toby’s break, and the embarrassment taking the form of his very public act. Toby had held on till he could hold on no more. Watson has the humanity (caninanity?) to acknowledge that a break was necessary, six miles into his olfactory pursuit. Thus refreshed, Toby led onwards.  

Viewed through the lens of the need for toilet breaks, the canon presents many  moments where one cannot but wonder whether a calamity occurred that was covered up by Watson when editing his casebooks for publication, or perhaps whether a story with a toilet would have been very different. In ’The Hound of the Baskervilles’ Holmes spent time secreted on the moor, which was effectively a vast privacy with many a boulder to hide behind. Perhaps when Watson discovers Holmes’ vacant hideout, Holmes was off behind a boulder, and spied Watson approaching. Modesty will prevent us from knowing.

The lack of access to a toilet could have huge impacts on a case. This article does not allow a detailed analysis of all 60 stories in the canon, but exemplars are presented. Percy Phelps spent two months in his sick room at Briarbrae in Woking in 'The Adventure of the Naval Treaty’, while his future brother-in-law Joseph Harrison waited in frustration for an opportunity when the room would be unoccupied to recover the stolen documents. We can only conclude that Phelps used a bed pan that meant he never left the room, otherwise Harrison would surely have simply waited a few hours (rather than months) for Phelps to shuffle off to the out house or water closet. That there was no water closet near Harrisons room at Briarbrae is perhaps supported by the fact that the compartment under the carpet where the Naval Treaty was hidden contained gas pipes for heating, but no water pipes. Sherlock himself may have used the garden at Briarbrae - when he spent hours in the gardens waiting to capture Harrison, he describes to Harrison and Watson that during this watch, he reached a clump of rhododendrons and "There I squatted down and awaited developments.”

Stakeouts and watches require patience, and time. In 'The Adventure of the Naval Treaty’ Holmes describes the stakeout as long, "almost as long, Watson, as when you and I waited in that deadly room when we looked into the little problem of the Speckled Band”. These waits also required silence and stillness. Holmes could rely on himself, but in "The Adventure of the Speckled Band”, how could Holmes be sure Watson wouldn’t plan ahead? Many a time Holmes would ask Watson before setting of an an adventure "Have you a pistol, Watson?”. Watson certainly casts himself as a dashing sidekick, armed and ready to act, but perhaps the truth is that Holmes was actually asking Watson a more critical question before leaving 221B: “Do you need to visit the water closet before we leave, Watson?”.

Many mysteries remain to be resolved. What contingency did Holmes, Watson, Merryweather and Jones have, when they set about a long wait in a bank vault in the Red Headed League? In this instance, Holmes Brought a pack of cards for the wait, but luckily for the group the wait was but an hour and fifteen minutes. Nevertheless, there must have been some uncomfortable moments in the still and dark of the vault.

I am told that as one ages, the need to visit a water closet increases in frequency. So perhaps, statistically speaking, the later stories in the canon offer better opportunities to catch our duo in the act (so to speak). In “His Last Bow” we do not have the benefit of Watson’s narration to provide intimate insights, and instead an unknown narrator describes the story. And so perhaps there was some deception when Holmes invited Watson to "Stand with me here up on the terrace” just before departing on the long car drive to London. What truly happened off the terrace? Perhaps the reader will be relieved to read that we’ll never know.


Sunday, January 25, 2026

John Bennett Shaw - a biography

There's a new Sherlockian book out from Wessex Press that provides a comprehensive series of 'primers' on influential Sherlockians, edited by Peter Ekrich and Rob Nunn. Pete and Rob have created several really excellent books - and keep coming up with great ideas. You can buy the book here.

I was humbled to be invited by Rob and Peter to write a chapter for this book, and intimidated to learn that it was John Bennett Shaw they wanted a biography on. Why intimidated? Well, I never met Shaw, but many who read the biography will have. Would I be correct? I felt comforted knowing that Steve Doyle would be helping edit the volume, and I spoke with a number of people who did know Shaw including Peter Blau, Evy Herzog, Ray Betzner, and Derham Groves who provided a wonderful anecdote for me.

My policy is to share to my blog a version of any article I publish. This is usually a late draft or submitted version (the equivalent of a scientific preprint), often with extra pictures added for context. This is to allow people who can't afford, or can't get hold of the original publication to still have a chance to read my Sherlockian writings.

Without further ado here is the draft biography on John Bennett Shaw.


John Bennett Shaw


Matthew D. Hall


They say you should never meet your heroes, yet people traveled from far and wide to make the pilgrimage to the door of John Bennet Shaw. His vacuum-cleaner strategy forcollecting Sherlockiana, his evangelical approach to educating others about the Sherlockian world, and his open-door policy for visitors from across the country and the world created an aura around his name. Shaw was a constant correspondent with many, and his expansive collection was donated in his lifetime to the University of Minnesota Library where it remains today, and set a precedent that others have followed to make material available to scholars in perpetuity. Shaw was Shaw-ly one of the greatest Sherlockians of the twentieth century, and his influence on the direction of the Sherlockian movement will never extinguish.


Perhaps the key to understand when interpreting Shaw’s ever-presence in the Sherlockian world, and how he engaged with it, is to know that no one had more fun with Holmes. It was a Grand Game, and one of friendship, fun, and mischief. Shaw was conspicuous in his Sherlockian fervor, and even his car carried the personalized plate SHERLOK. It is Shaw who is reputed to have first said to have a Sherlockian meeting you need two Sherlockians and a bottle, but in a pinch, one of the Sherlockians could be dispensed with”. His name forever lives on at the University of Minnesota library where the world’s largest collection of Sherlockian works, The Sherlock Holmes Collections, includes all of Shaws volumes.


Shaw’s life


John was born in 1913 in Tulsa, OK, and that is where he lived for most of the next five decades. He was deeply involved in literary circles there, even raising funds to build the library, and he served on its board. As a boy Shaw discovered Sherlock, and after college he committed to a life of collecting. In 1938 he married Margaret Mary Fitzgerald, and they had two children-a son, Patrick, and a daughter, Katie. Margaret died in 1969 aged 54. Shaw was a dedicated Catholic with a love of G.K. Chesterton (his first collection was of Chesterton and this he donated to Notre Dame), attended Notre Dame for college, and was a successful businessman including directing a funeral home, an oil drilling company, and a bookstore. Shaw joked that all three jobs involved holes - the first two in the ground, and the latter required a hole in the head.



Shaw essentially retired when he moved to Santa Fe in 1970 (aged 57), and dedicated his time in NM to Sherlock. There, he married Dorothy Rowe in 1971, and Dorothy was deeply involved in every aspect of his Sherlockian life. John died on October 3rd 1994, and is buried in Rosario Cemetery, Santa Fe, NM, with his wife Dorothy and daughter Catherine Mary.


Shaw the collector


In the introduction to Ron De Waal’s Universal Sherlock Holmes, Shaw summarized his approach to creating a collection:


"I am interested in Sherlock Holmes, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, and the world in which they live. So what do I do? I obtain as many books, pamphlets, periodicals, Holmes Society publications, video and audio tapes, and other materials such as statues, puzzles, plaques, T-shirts, mugs, and even a Professor Moriarty toilet seat as I can.”


At its peak it was said to be the largest privately held Sherlockian collection in the world, containing some 12,000 books, 3,500 periodicals, 30,000 clippings in alphabetically arranged notebooks, and a vast amount of other Sherlockian ephemera. Delightful ‘home video’ recordings exist of visits to Shaw’s home library, following him as he provides comedic commentary on books and his experiences in acquiring them. In a 1991 home video, Shaw fakes embarrassment over the number of volumes in the library, saying “Everything is now 60% double rows (of books). It’s like having a harem. It’s just disgraceful, but there’s nothing I can do”. 

Many of the questions asked by visitors to the library were answered in a 16-page booklet John published in 1991 titled ‘Collecting Sherlockiana - An Essay by John Bennett Shaw, BSI.’ John didn’t just collect books in English - he owned over 2,000 volumes in languages including Braille, Pitman and Gregg Shorthand, Esperanto, and Pig Latin. The original essay was in a limited edition, but was re-published by Catherine Cooke along with the Shaw 100 list (Rupert Books, 1998, and see below). Shaw writes in his essay ‘It is not a shelf of books, nor is it a collection. It is a library…. I fully agree with Vincent Starrett that when we are collecting books, we are collecting happiness’.


In October 1995, one year after Shaws death, his library was dedicated as part of the new John Bennett Shaw Collection at the University of Minnesota. Shaw had joked in the early 90s that when all the books were boxed and ready to ship to the MN, the number of boxes came to 221”.


The Baker Street Irregulars


Shaw was given the canonical investiture of The Hans Sloane of My Age” when made

a Baker Street Irregular in 1965, later served as Simpson” (secretary), and received the rare Two-Shilling Award in 1980. Julian Wolff conferred Shaw with a name referenced in the canonical story The Three Garridebs. In the story, Nathan Garrideb is tricked into believing he will soon receive five million pounds just for being a Garrideb. Garrideb exclaims to Holmes: 


Five million dollars was the sum named. There are a dozen specimens in the market at the present moment which fill gaps in my collection, and which I am unable to purchase for want of a few hundred pounds. Just think what I could do with five million dollars. Why, I have the nucleus of a national collection. I shall be the Hans Sloane of my age.” 


Sir Hans Sloane (1660-1753) was a British physician and President of the Royal Society. Sloane’s greatest fame came as a collector of plants and books, which became the foundational collection of The British Museum (just around the corner from where Conan Doyle once lived!). Shaw recognized the commonality of two consummate collectors, and Wolff also forecast that Shaw would follow in Sloane’s steps, organizing for his collection to move to a public institution.


Shaw the Correspondent


Shaw's written output was dominated by private correspondence, almost all at a typewriter and on his personalized stationary. Hw mentored generations of new Sherlockians, answered questions, and gave advice. Steven Spielberg once flew a script by private jet to Shaw’s home for review and comment.


A highlight of their correspondence were the greeting cards that the Shaw’s sent every Christmas. One of his last cards (1992) highlighted his support of the relatively new policy of allowing women to be inducted into the BSI:


I have selected the happy lady and the sad dog to suggest that the female is off to join The Baker Street Irregulars and that the grumpy hound depicts the minority of the members of this unusual organization who have been disturbed by the change in policy. 


Shaw was truly progressive in this regard. In 1968, a Picket Line protest was held outside Cavanagh’s Restaurant by women frustrated at the male-only membership rules of the BSI - a formative event in the history of the Adventuresses of Sherlock Holmes (ASH). Evelyn Herzog has related that Peter Blau and Shaw were the two BSI members who came down to remedy matters.  They took the protesters into the bar for cocktails and to hear their perspective. It was Shaw who undertook to carry a statement from the picketers to Dr. Wolff. Versions of the story differ, but Shaw was a key participant in those historic events, and his Christmas card over two decades later enforces his open-hearted view that the Sherlockian world be inclusive, not exclusive. 


This enlightened view didn’t stifle Shaw’s commitment to collecting though. A letter from Dorothy Rowe Shaw in the second ASH newsletter (July 15, 1975) states that “John was quite upset that he did not receive the newsletter — he xeroxed mine and gave me the copy.” (!!!)


The Shaw 100 and other publications 


While formal publications were a lesser part of Shaw’s output, what he did create had a profound impact. In particular he was the creator of the famed ‘Shaw 100’ - not so much a publication as a list that Shaw created and circulated in the latter half of the 1970s. 


As early as 1977, John Shaw distributed an annotated list of 100 books, pamphlets, and periodicals” that he considered essential for ‘The Basic Holmesian Library'. The Shaw 100, as it came to be known, was a pivotal piece that helped make Shaw famous in Sherlockian circles. The list had its genesis in an exhibition Shaw organized - and the list was inspired by the catalog of that first exhibition. At workshops (see below) Shaw would distribute the list, and it would be copied and distributed and travel hand-to-hand across the Sherlockian world. Shaw’s list attempted to list One Hundred items that would give one an in-depth view of the entire Holmesian culture. A consequence of course is that owning the books on the list could be achieved by very few - it included Starrett’s ‘Unique Hamlet’ (1920) of which only sixty or so copies were created, but thankfully not the Beeton’s Christmas Annual (which Shaw once passed up an opportunity to purchase and always regretted).


Shaw revised and optimized the list multiple times over the years. In 1995 the list was updated by E. W. McDiarmid and Peter Blau for the official dedication of Shaws collection at the University of Minnesota, in Minneapolis - and with a focus on more attainable items. The list also became the inspiration for those created by others. 


Aside from the essay on collecting mentioned earlier, Shaw also published two quiz books: the ‘Ragged Shaw: The Master Sleuth Quiz Book’ (Gasoline Press, 1987), and the ‘Really Ragged Shaw: Being The Expanded Ragged Shaw’ (The Battered Silicon Dispatch Box, 1994). The title of each is a delightful nod both to the author and to the grove of trees referenced in The Priory School. The origin of these two publications lay in the diabolical quizzes that Shaw was notorious for creating and bringing to almost every scion meeting and conference that he had organized. For example, attendees of the second Shaw workshop in 1983 were set ‘Holmeswork’: “The cases around which the quizzes will revolve are The Stockbroker’s Clerk and The Problem with Thor Bridge. Participants are encouraged to bring a copy of the Holmes Canon and a copy of Starrett’s The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes.” Menacing! 


Shaws notoriety as a luminary and his magnetism meant that he was regularly provided introductions for the works that others were publishing. Shaw also assisted Ronald De Waal in writing his phenomenal bibliography ‘The World Bibliography of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson’ (1974), by making his Sherlockian collection available to him in Tulsa and later in Santa Fe. De Wall spent an extended period of time (ninety-seven days, twelve hours a day!) examining and cataloging the items in Shaw’s library for his book. In 1994, Shaw wrote the introduction for De Waals multivolume bibliography, ‘The Universal Sherlock Holmes’. In the introduction, Shaw wrote ‘Ronald De Waal and his prodigious and ambitious literary project are a success — for him a triumph; for me a justification for being a one-subject collector. It is De Waal who made my efforts worthwhile.’ Shaw died just before the bibliography was published. 


The Sherlock Holmes workshops


Shaw launched the first of his Sherlock Holmes Workshops in 1977. Held over five days at his alma mater Notre Dame (IN), the first event was likely intended to be a one-off. The first Shaw Sherlock Holmes Workshop was a full five-day event, but subsequent workshops evolved into weekend events, Friday thru Sunday. John was the main presenter and a faculty of invited guests  (most often, noted Sherlockian scholars), presented Sherlockian papers and film clips. There were book discussions, sing-alongs, and one or more of Shaws devilish quizzes (described above). This structure became the template for Sherlock Holmes Symposia that were organized from 1977 to 1993, a dozen or so meetings in all. 



The Sherlockian world is a broad church, and Shaw’s workshop agendas accommodated all viewpoints and areas of interest. The workshops drew people from across America, and speakers such as the English Holmesians Michael Hardwick & Michael Harrison, the legendary actress and Sherlock script-writer Edith Meiser, and luminaries like Leslie Klinger. It is also clear that Shaw was spreading awareness far and wide, with workshops in all parts of the country. Workshops were mainly held at institutions of education, including prestigious locations such as Johns Hopkins, William & Mary, and Stanford.


These meetings were a critical entry point for many new Sherlockians. While there had been a few conferences prior to Shaw, his meetings set the standard for conferences such as those organized by the Baker Street Irregulars, and other regular meetings that now exist across the country. Legendary Sherlockian Ray Betzner shared his memories of first meeting Shaw at his first Sherlock conference:


“My first Shaw workshop was in 1980 in Pittsburgh. I was very new to the Sherlockian world and had been corresponding with Shaw for several years. When I pulled into the parking lot at Duquesne University, I saw the man himself in front of me: large and graying with a bolo tie and a Sherlock Holmes belt buckle struggling mightily to hold in his girth. Being a bit of a smart aleck, I opened my car door and approached him with my hand out, saying “You have lately been in Santa Fe, I perceive.” John squinted at me with his one good eye and replied, “I can’t place your face, but I’ll try to forget it.” We both laughed and so it began.”


“The talks on Saturday were a revelation… After the banquet on Saturday, Shaw came up to me and asked if I had any plans. I did not. He invited me up to the large corner dorm room he and Dorothy were sharing. A very shy woman, whom I later learned was Evy Herzog, was knitting and giggling in the corner. Dorothy Shaw was talking miniatures with Maureen Green. Ann Byerly raced in at one point to play on the flute the introduction of the Universal Sherlock Holmes films that she had just taught herself. And through it all John kept up a commentary of anecdotes, observations and horrible puns. It was, in short, a total delight.At some point I sat back and realized I had found my people. And I’ve never looked back.”


Shaw’s scions


Shaw’s influence on the Sherlockian community was profound. John and Dorothy travelled to Sherlockian events across the U.S., including Baker Street Irregulars dinners, and local scion meetings in multiple states. Known as the Johnny Appleseed of Sherlockian Scions,” he helped many Sherlock Holmes groups launch their scion activities.


When in Tulsa and immersed in public library management, Shaw co-founded the Sub-Librarians Scion of the BSI. It was first convened by Shaw in 1967 at the American Library Association (ALA) annual conference in San Francisco, and he ran the scion till 1972. It continues as an active scion - genius really - as its membership is not geographic, but based on profession.



In NM, Shaw started the Brothers Three of Moriarty scion society, a group which - appropriately - met in the small town of Moriarty. The scion also sponsored the Annual Colonel Moran Trap shoot, and an annual event called UN-happy Birthday (Moriarty You Bastard)". Presentations were given, toasts were lifted (sometimes with explicit language), a quiz was conducted, songs were sung, and the finale was the Recessional”: a procession to the Moriarty memorial manure pile with the annual deposit, which was then converted into a bonfire. In 1987 Shaw wrote that ‘Our deposits this year included Texas long-horn, Sea Gull and Coyote’, and in earlier years Governors and Senators had sent contributions. The trap-shoot event included skeet-shooting competitions, and there was also a target featuring the silhouette of Moriartys henchman, Colonel Sebastian Moran. 


Derham Groves created a delightful book "You bastard Moriarty : being a consideration of the collectability of ephemera related to the greatest detective that never lived, Sherlock Holmes” (Black Jack Press, 1996). It includes photographs of the now-closed Frontier Saloon in Moriarty. Groves relates that one year while the members of the Brothers Three of Moriarty were taking feces to add to the Moriarty Manure Pile outside the saloon, "one of the town drunks buttonholed John and slurred: "Hey Shaw, I jus' wanna let you know that we all appreciate you bringing some culture to this fucking town” !!!  


Shaw’s bookplate


Shaw’s bookplate deserves mention - it one of of the iconic Sherlockian images - it was debuted by Shaw in his 1969 Christmas letter. The title of the card was "On Choosing a Library for a Desert Island" and states "The shelf of the best books: books for pleasure, books for reference, books for mental expansion, books for peace of mind, What books would you choose?” Shaw then included an excerpt from an essay upon this subject taken from "The Anatomy of Bibliomania" by Holbrook Jackson, and finishes by revealing ‘I have made my choice and here it is pictured on my new Bookplate’: 




The legacy 


The great news about Shaw is that - for now - he is very much in living memory. If you want to learn more about Shaw, the Baker Street Journal Christmas Annual for 2023 titled ‘John Bennett Shaw Remembered’ has a collection of articles that cover personal recollections of many of the areas described in this chapter. Furthermore, the December 1990 issue of the Baker Street Journal was edited by Philip A. Shreffler as a surprise tribute to Shaw, with articles by many of his friends. This article used those sources, and critically the marvelous site maintained by Jim Hawkins (www.johnbennettshaw.com that has collected an incredible range of primary materials on John Bennett Shaw and made them available to the world.


While the author of this article did not know Shaw, he marvels at the immense and enduring influence that Shaw has had on the Sherlockian world. It is intimidating to create an overview of a person within living memory. If I could get in a time machine and transport myself to one Sherlockian time and place, it would surely be to New Mexico, to shadow JBS around his library as he shared stories of his books, to travel with him to Moriarty NM for a scion meeting, and I would bring with me some exotic dung to add to the ancient pile of manure - all for the fun of the Grand Game.


When Shaw died, Peter Blau wrote in his Scuttlebutt newsletter some fitting closing remarks: “John was unique in many ways, but I think the most important of all his achievements was that he was such a good friend to so many of us… I think it was the fun he found in the world of Sherlockians that was most important to John, far more so than the things he collected”.

BSI weekend 2026 summary

Well, the 2026 Baker Street Irregulars 'weekend' in Manhattan has come and gone. It was a wonderful visit, and in this post I'll...